What are the safest baby bottles?
What are the safest sunscreens?
What about phosphates in dishwasher detergents?
Should I be using anti-bacterial soaps?
How can I get a PBDE-free mattress?
Are there alternatives to polyurethane?
What does the government’s decision on BPA mean for reusable water bottles?
For years, some of the most popular reusable water bottles have been made from a hard, clear plastic called polycarbonate. The problem is that one of the key components of polycarbonate is the endocrine-disrupting chemical bisphenol-A (BPA). A growing body of research has shown that polycarbonate bottles can leach bisphenol-A into the liquid they contain, making the hard plastic containers toxic water bottles.
Bisphenol-A mimics the female hormone estrogen and has been shown to cause defective cell division during development, even at extremely low doses. A growing number of studies have linked bisphenol-A to other kinds of reproductive and developmental damage, as well as breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men. Recent research has also suggested it may play a role in the development of Alzheimer's disease and even diabetes, because of its effect in causing insulin resistance.
The demand from consumer health and environmental groups for regulatory action against BPA prompted the federal government to fast-track a screening assessment of BPA in 2007. That assessment was finally released April 18, 2008 and declared that BPA was CEPA-toxic under the provisions of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. BPA was declared to be a substance posing a danger to both human health and the environment. Health Minister Tony Clement also announced that following a 60-day comment period, the government would introduce legislation to ban the sale and importation of polycarbonate baby bottles in Canada.
Even before the announcement, several retail chains, led by Mountain Equipment Co-op, had taken polycarbonate water bottles off their shelves because of health concerns over BPA. Retailers also removed polycarbonate baby bottles. In addition, the biggest manufacturer of polycarbonate water bottles, whose products are sold under the Nalgene name, announced that it would no longer be making polycarbonate bottles, opting for a new plastic polymer instead.
However, the government has not taken any action to limit the sale of polycarbonate water bottles and has not offered any advice to consumers other than to suggest that pregnant women should not put hot water or other liquids in their polycarbonate water bottles. Making it even more confusing for consumers, at least one outdoor equipment store in Manitoba announced that it was putting the toxic water bottles bottles back on store shelves.
Even though major retailers won’t be carrying them, it’s likely that some stores will still stock polycarbonate bottles, especially if cheap imported bottles move in to replace those Nalgene used to make.
The best choices for a re-useable water bottle are those made from stainless steel. They can handle most liquids, can be cleaned easily and, most important, don’t leach any chemicals.
Aluminum bottles are also an option but not just any aluminum bottles. Some aluminum bottles have an epoxy resin lining, which can also leach chemicals, including BPA. Two bottles that have shown no leaching in independent tests are Laken and Sigg. Both use proprietary formulas for their coatings.
If you want a plastic bottle, the safest bottles to use are made of high-density polyethylene, or HDPE (identified by the number 2 in the recycling triangle symbol on the bottom), low-density polyethylene, or LDPE (#4) or polypropylene (#5). Nalgene makes a number of styles and sizes of bottles made from UVPE, which is a version of HDPE designed to withstand UV radiation from sunlight, which can cause plastic to deteriorate over time.
Nalgene and another major manufacturer, Camelbak, are both planning to bring out a new line of bottles made of a plastic polymer from Eastman called Tritan copolyester. It’s designed to replace polycarbonate and will be similar, providing hard plastic bottles that can be clear or coloured. It also claims to be BPA- and phthalate free.
However Tritan copolyester hasn’t been independently tested yet to verify the claims or rule out any other chemical leaching.
The new plastic, expected to be on the market this year, will also make it a bit trickier for consumers to navigate the recycling numbers on the bottom of the bottle. Like polycarbonate, it will carry the number 7 in the recycling triangle (#7 is a catch-all category for a number of plastics not otherwise identified). So potential buyers will have to make sure they’re buying the new material and not polycarbonate. Nalgene and Camelbak will undoubtedly be marketing the new bottles as BPA-free, making that job a little easier.
Sunscreen is very important part of skin cancer prevention, and it's especially important for kids who can get a serious sunburn long before they feel any discomfort. For effective protection, the product should really be a sunblock (over SPF 12) and should have a sun protection factor of at least 15 and preferably 30 or higher.
Still, it's not always easy to know what's in the sunscreen you're using.
Sunblocks typically contain both chemical sunblock ingredients, such as methoxycinnamate and Parsol 1789, and physical sunblocks, such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, which scatter the ultraviolet light rays, reducing the exposure.
One chemical sunblock that was formerly used widely is para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA). Because of the high incidence of PABA allergy, it's now rarely used as an active ingredient in sunblocks and many products are advertised as PABA-free.
Sunscreen is exempted from the new Health Canada regulations requiring ingredient labelling on products, but many manufacturers do list the ingredients as they are required to do with cosmetics. Some ingredients to avoid wherever possible include: formaldehyde, diazalidonyl urea (which can form formaldehyde), triethanolamine and parabens.
Parabens is the group name for several compounds, including methyl paraben and butyl paraben, which have raised concern in recent research because they are endocrine-disrupting chemicals that mimic the female hormone estrogen. Evidence suggests that they could affect reproductive development in boys, making sunscreen products with parabens an issue for pregnant women as well as children.
Used as preservatives, are in many sunscreen preparations, parabens are found in many sunscreens, particularly creams and lotions, but it is possible to find parabens-free products. Many of them are among those rated the lowest risk by the U.S. Environmental Working Group in its 2004 survey of products. They include: KINeSYS Kids 30 and KINeSYS Fragrance-Free 30, Ombrelle Sport 30, London Drug Ultra Sport 40 and California Baby Sunscreen Lotion 30.
Burt’s Bees has also introduced Chemical Free Sunscreen 15, which is parabens- and chemical sunblock-free. And UV Natural, a SPF 30 sunscreen from Australia that uses only zinc oxide as sunblock, is available in health food stores and online retailers in Canada.
Phosphates in detergent and other cleaning products were an important environmental issue in the 1960s, since they were a major factor in the death of many lakes and rivers throughout North America through a process called "eutrophication." That process occurs when high levels of nutrients (in this case phosphorus) in wastewater encourage heavy growth of algae and other aquatic plants. Then, as those plants died, their decomposition uses up the supply of oxygen in the water, effectively suffocating fish populations.
There were efforts in the 1960s and 1970s in both the U.S. and Canada to ban phosphates but no ban was ever introduced. Instead, Environment Canada enacted regulations, now included in the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, to limit phosphate content in detergents to 5 per cent by weight. But there are no restrictions on other products.
As a result, many products, notably automatic dishwasher detergents, still include high levels of phosphates as builders in their products, to increase the cleaning power.
Although the measures that were introduced have greatly reduced the problem of eutrophication, it's still a good idea to avoid high phosphate products. Seventh Generation and Nature Clean both offer dishwasher detergents that clean effectively without phosphates.
I'm worried picking up cold germs. Should I be using anti-bacterial soaps regularly?
News stories about E. coli bacteria in food and new strains of flu and cold viruses are a daily event these days. In fact, they’ve made it seem almost imperative that everyone use some form of antiseptic protection, and manufacturers have responded with dozens of anti-bacterial soaps, from bar soaps to body washes to liquid soaps in pump bottles.
Most of the products contain triclosan, a chlorinated compound with the chemical name 5-chloro-2(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) phenol. Triclosan has been used in anti-bacterial scrubs in hospitals for many years and was not considered to have a significant impact because of that limited use. But now, its use by millions of people has raised several concerns about both its impact and toxicity:
- Its widespread use in consumer products at low dilutions could lead to widespread antibiotic resistance. Bacterial resistance to triclosan has been shown in the laboratory;
- As a chlorinated substance, triclosan may be contaminated during manufacture by dioxins, some of which may be carcinogenic;
- Triclosan can react with the chlorine in tap water to form small amounts of chloroform, which is carcinogenic in high exposures;
- Triclosan may react with sunlight in the environment to form dioxins and is not removed from wastewater in treatment plants.
In addition, triclosan is an effective anti-bacterial but it is not considered a virucide. So it is of no value in protecting against colds and flus, which are caused by viruses.
Given all those factors, it doesn’t seem to make sense to use anti-bacterial soaps on a routine basis. In fact, the U.S. Center for Disease Control recommends that handwashing with regular soap and water is the best practice and is effective in preventing contamination and warding off infections.
For more information:
Beyond Pesticides report
I want to buy a new mattress and living room furniture but I’m concerned that it might have PBDEs (fire retardant chemicals) in it? Can I get PBDE-free products?
Until about five years, manufacturers of foam used in mattresses and upholstered furniture routinely treated the foam with fire retardant chemicals known as polybrominated diphenyl ethers, or PBDEs. But if the past few years, biologists have discovered that PBDEs are persistent in the environment and are showing up in the blood and tissue of orcas, grizzly bears and salmon, as well as the breast milk of women. Research into their health effects continues, but they haven been associated with possible damage to the thyroid, impairment of reproductive and immune function. Alarmed over the growing danger, regulators in Europe and several U.S. states have banned two groups of PBDEs. Canada is considering action as well, but hasn’t yet done so.
The good news is that most mattresses made in Canada do not use fire retardants at all. We canvassed the major Canada manufacturers of mattresses and they assured us that fire retardants are now neither required nor used. Major Canadian retail specialists in bedding, such as Sleep Country Canada, have stated that they do not use fire retardant chemicals in their mattresses. Similarly, the main suppliers of foam for bedding and upholstered furniture stated that when they are supplying foam materials for products intended for the Canadian market, fired retardant chemicals aren’t used.
But in some cases, where materials are being supplied for manufacturers serving the entire North American market, fire retardants are used to conform to the fire requirements in such states as California and Maine. The retail giant IKEA was one of the first to request PBDE-free products from suppliers, but because many products are made to supply IKEA stores in both the U.S. and Canada, they’re made with different fire retardants, knows as chlorinated phosphate esters, or TCEP. While not environmentally persistent like PBDEs, they are potentially toxic and the European Union may soon be taking action to regulate them. In the meantime Canadians buying mattresses from IKEA may be getting a fire retardant that they don’t need and probably don’t want.
Some tips in getting a mattress or upholstered furniture:
- Look for a retailer selling products made in Canada for the Canadian market.
- If it’s a larger chain that may be selling products intended for the wider North American market, ask whether the products contain fire retardants. Insist on getting an informed answer. If you don’t, go to a store where you know products were made in Canada to Canadian standards.
- For those willing to spend the extra money, there are also other bedding alternatives, including those with wool and cotton-filled mattresses that are not treated with fire retardants. Companies such as Natura Sleep Products and Obasan are among those whose products can be viewed online.
I’ve heard that polyurethane foam in couches and mattresses can be toxic. Are there alternatives?
Flexible polyurethane foam is one of a number of chemical polymers that came into wide use following Word War II for automotive seats, upholstered furniture and mattresses. It retains its resilience and can be easily cut to shape, making it useful for hundreds of applications.
The basic manufacturing process involves reacting an ingredient called toluene diisocyanate (TDI) with a polyol, an alcohol-based substance that has, in turn, been created by a prior chemical reaction with another ingredient called methyloxirane (also known as propylene oxide).
The problem is that TDI and methyloxirane are both carcinogenic chemicals and workers are exposed to them in the manufacturing process. Both types of TDI used in foam manufacturing are classified as possible human carcinogens (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Methyloxirane is also a 2B carcinogen according to IARC, and the U.S. National Toxicology program says it is “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.”
In January, 2008, Health Canada assessed methyloxirane under the Challenge batch of 200 high-priority chemicals and declared it a toxic chemical “that constitutes or may constitute a danger to human life or health.”
Based on lab experiments, TDI poses a risk of nasal cancer for exposed workers. Because it is a respiratory sensitizer, it can cause occupational asthma for workers exposed to it, even at levels listed as “safe” by occupational health agencies.
It’s not expected that consumers will be directly exposed to TDI or methyloxirane in polyurethane furniture or mattresses, although there is evidence that it could cause asthmatic reactions as it breaks down and becomes part of house dust. But because polyurethane poses a fire hazard, fire retardants are often added to meet fire codes, thus adding to the material’s toxicity.
Studies conducted by the polyurethane industry have also shown that polyurethane does not break down in landfills, adding to a long term waste problem.
Recently, some manufacturers have introduced soy-based polyurethane in an effort to address concerns about toxicity and uses of non-renewable petroleum-based polyols. Some retailers have even presented soy-based polyurethane as a “green alternative.”
While it may be greener than conventional polyurethane, it isn’t really an alternative. First, soybean oil can only replace a small percentage of the polyol —typically 5-40 per cent — because higher soy concentrations give the product a strong, vegetable-oil odour, which doesn’t help sell furniture. But even more important that that, carcinogenic TDI is still used to create the final product.
The best alternative to polyurethane in furniture and mattresses is natural latex, which is derived from the rubber tree plant and is a renewable resource. It holds its shape well and latex mattresses can last much longer than polyurethane-based products. Although latex gloves and other direct-contact materials can trigger an allergic reaction in some people, there is nothing in the literature that we have seen to show that latex-padded furniture or mattresses pose any problem, probably because there is no direct contact.
Synthetic latex is also widely used in products and while it is probably better than polyurethane, most is made from a styrene-butadiene polymer. That doesn’t pose a risk to consumers, but workers are exposed to a carcinogen — styrene — in the production process.
For mattresses, wool is also used as a safe, environmentally-preferable alternative to foam. Wool mattresses are harder to come by, but they are available.
Some other things to look for in healthy, environmentally-preferable furniture and mattresses include non-toxic adhesives, upholstery materials that are certified to be heavy-metal free and woods that carry a Forest Stewardship Council certification for good management and sustainable practices.
Some sources of polyurethane-free furniture and mattresses:
Furniture:
GreenRooms, Oakville ON www.greenrooms.ca
Upholstery Arts, Vancouver www.uphosteryarts.ca
Mattresses:
Good Planet Company, Victoria www.goodplanet.com
Aviva Natural Health, Winnipeg www.aviva.ca
The Mattress & Sleep COmpany, Edmonton www.tmasc.ca
McLeary’s Mattress ad Furniture, Kelowna www.mclearysfurniture.com
Sleeptek, Ottawa www.sleeptek.ca
Soma Beds and Sleep Products, Toronto www.somasleep.ca